Differences between Taiwanese and US cultural beliefs about ideal adult attachment.
By: Wang, Chia-Chih DC
Analytics: Show analyticsContent type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeSubject(s): Attachment behavior | Culture -- Study and teaching | College/Students | Attachment theory (Communication) | Sex differencesLOC classification: BF637 .C6 .J826 In: Journal of Counseling Psychology v. 53 no. 2 (Apr. 2006) pp. 192-204.Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOK | Periodicals Section | Periodicals Section Periodicals Section | BF637.C6.J6 (Browse shelf) | Available | PER 1000DB |
ABSTRACT : Some researchers believe that important tenets of attachment theory are culturally universal, whereas others claim that key constructs are rooted in Western values and should not be generalized further. To explore possible cultural differences in adults, undergraduates from Taiwan (n = 280) and the United States (n = 268) were asked in the present study to complete a self-report measure of adult attachment, the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (K. A. Brennan, C. L. Clark, & P. R. Shaver, 1998), as they believed "an ideally emotionally and psychologically healthy person of your own gender in your culture" would respond. Findings suggested significant differences by cultural group, gender, and Gender x Culture interactions. Taiwanese women and men endorsed more avoidance in beliefs about ideal adult attachment than their U.S. counterparts, and Taiwanese men endorsed more anxiety than U.S. men. These cultural differences were not explained by group differences in independent and interdependent self-construal.
There are no comments for this item.